Publication Date

8-2023

Date of Final Oral Examination (Defense)

3-27-2023

Type of Culminating Activity

Thesis

Degree Title

Master of Science in Biological Science

Department

Biology

Supervisory Committee Chair

Ian Robertson, Ph.D.

Supervisory Committee Member

David Pilliod, Ph.D.

Supervisory Committee Member

Trevor Caughlin, Ph.D.

Abstract

Vegetation restoration efforts in the sagebrush steppe to date have yielded mixed results. Although many factors contribute to variation in restoration outcomes, seed predation by harvester ants may be an important yet overlooked source of seed loss. Using a selection of grass and forb seeds commonly seeded in local restoration projects, we conducted a field experiment to evaluate whether seed species and spatial arrangement (i.e., distance of seed patches from ant colonies and from each other) affected patterns of seed consumption by Owyhee harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex salinus. To further examine the ecological factors that may affect foraging by harvester ants, we mapped the matrix of vegetation surrounding each harvester ant colony in our experiment and assessed the influences of cheatgrass, Bromus tectorum, cover and Sandberg bluegrass, Poa secunda, cover on seed removal. To provide context for ant seed preferences, we evaluated differences in metrics of seed handling and nutrient content among the seed species in our mix. We found that seeds placed closer to colonies were generally more vulnerable to predation than those placed farther away, and seeds in closely spaced patches were generally more vulnerable than seeds in widely spaced patches. However, these effects differed in strength by seed species, and there was an interaction between the distance from colonies and the distance between patches in terms of seed removal for three of the seed species in our mix. For these species (Indian ricegrass, Munro’s globe mallow, and Great Basin wildrye), the protective effect of distance between patches decreased as distance from the colony increased. Cheatgrass cover and bluegrass cover both had small protective effects on seeds, suggesting that harvester ant foraging behaviors may be shaped by local vegetation cover. We found significant differences in removal rates among the seed species; Indian ricegrass was most preferred by harvester ants, followed by Munro’s globe mallow, Great Basin wildrye, and Palmer’s penstemon. Our seed handling and nutrition data yielded no clear explanations for these preferences. Taken together, these results offer insight into the foraging ecology of harvester ants and may provide context for the implementation and success of future restoration efforts.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18122/td.2107.boisestate

Available for download on Friday, August 01, 2025

Included in

Biology Commons

Share

COinS