Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-2024
Abstract
The purposes of this study included conducting a meta-analysis and reviewing the study reporting quality of math interventions implemented in informal learning environments (e.g., the home) by children’s caregivers. This meta-analysis included 25 preschool to third-grade math interventions with 83 effect sizes that yielded a statistically significant summary effect (g = 0.26, 95% CI [0.07, 0.45) on children’s math achievement. Significant moderators of the treatment effect included the intensity of caregiver training and type of outcome measure. There were larger average effects for interventions with caregiver training that included follow-up support and for outcomes that were comprehensive early numeracy measures. Studies met 58.0% of reporting quality indicators, and analyses revealed that quality of reporting has improved in recent years. The results of this study offer several recommendations for researchers and practitioners, particularly given the growing evidence base of math interventions conducted in informal learning environments.
Copyright Statement
This article is protected by copyright and reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses. Users may also download and save a local copy for the user's personal reference.
Nelson, G.; Carter, H.; Boedeker, P.; Knowles, E.; Buckmiller,C.; and Eames, J. "A Meta-Analysis and Quality Review of Mathematics Interventions Conducted in Informal Learning Environments with Caregivers and Children", Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 112-152.
Copyright © 2024, AERA. Published on behalf of AERA by SAGE Publications. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231156182
Publication Information
Nelson, Gena; Carter, Hannah; Boedeker, Peter; Knowles, Emma; Buckmiller, Claire; and Eames, Jessica. (2024). "A Meta-Analysis and Quality Review of Mathematics Interventions Conducted in Informal Learning Environments with Caregivers and Children". Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 112-152. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231156182