Publication Date

8-2020

Date of Final Oral Examination (Defense)

6-26-2020

Type of Culminating Activity

Thesis

Degree Title

Master of Science in Raptor Biology

Department

Biology

Major Advisor

Julie A. Heath, Ph.D.

Advisor

Chris J.W. McClure, Ph.D.

Advisor

Jesse R. Barber, Ph.D.

Abstract

Climate-driven advances in the start of spring may result in a phenological mismatch between peak-prey abundance and the breeding season of secondary consumers. Phenological mismatch has been well-studied in insectivorous birds for which reproductive productivity is strongly linked to caterpillar abundance. The effects of mismatch on the productivity of dietary generalists, that forage on several types of prey, are less well-understood. Further, few studies have addressed questions about the effects of mismatch on survival, an important component of fitness that can be affected by breeding in sub-optimal conditions. We examined the relationship between phenological mismatch and fitness for a widespread generalist raptor, the American kestrel (Falco sparverius). In the first chapter, we collected productivity data from nest observations across the contiguous US and southern Canada and quantified phenological mismatch on each nest as the difference in days between the start of spring and clutch initiation. Then, we examined the relationship between mismatch, location, and productivity. Also, we investigated whether incubation behavior leading to hatching-asynchrony was related to phenological mismatch. Kestrels that laid eggs after the start of spring had fewer nestlings and higher rates of nest failure compared to kestrels that laid eggs before the start of spring. The strength of the mismatch effect depended on location. In the northeast, the number of fledglings per brood and rates of nest success were high for pairs nesting before the start of spring, but the effect of phenological mismatch was strongest here, with rapid declines in nest success associated with mismatch. Whereas, in the xi southwest, early-laying pairs had lower productivity and success relative to the northeast, but the effects of phenological mismatch were not as strong as the northeast. The effect of location is likely related to climatic constraints on the growing season and the time window for kestrel breeding that are becoming stronger in the northeast and weaker in the southwest. The timing of male incubation behavior was associated with hatching asynchrony, and males breeding after the start of spring were more likely to initiate incubation early as opposed to males breeding before the spring index date, suggesting that hatching asynchrony is a possible mechanism to cope with phenological mismatch.

In the second chapter, we investigated the relationships between phenological mismatch and survival using mark-and-recapture data from two distinct, long-term study sites in Idaho and New Jersey where kestrel exhibit difference migration strategies. We created a multistate mark-recapture models to estimate the annual survival of adult (afterhatch- year) and juvenile (hatch-year or yearling) kestrels. For the multistate framework, we categorized the phenological mismatch of nests at each site “earlier” or “later” relative to the yearly median difference in days between clutch initiation date and the start-of-spring date, which was estimated at each nest box location. In addition, we included covariates for nesting success, sex, and minimum winter temperature anomaly in our survival models. Mismatch was associated with the survival of kestrels that produced young; however, the direction of this effect differed between populations. In Idaho, successful kestrels had higher survival when they bred “earlier” rather than “later.” In New Jersey, successful kestrels had higher survival when they bred “later” rather than “earlier." Differences in survival between sites may reflect differences in seasonality, climate change patterns, or consequences of migration strategies. For partially migrant xii populations (i.e, Idaho kestrels), mismatch may rapidly drive directional selection for birds to breed earlier by favoring survival and productivity, but for fully migrant populations (i.e., New Jersey) that have a limited window of time to reproduce, mismatch may create trade-offs between reproduction and survival. Mismatch did not affect the survival of adult birds with failed nests, and there was no difference in survival between hatch-year birds produced from “earlier” or “later” nests. In Idaho, males had higher survival rates than females and warmer winter temperatures positively correlated with survival in all age and sex classes. In New Jersey, sex and winter temperature did not explain survival. In sum, we found negative consequences of phenological mismatch on the fitness of American kestrels, generalist predator. For both productivity and survival, the effect of mismatch was more severe for kestrels in the northeast, where the breeding season is shorter and kestrels more migratory when compared to the west. These results demonstrate that duration of breeding season is an important factor to consider when assessing vulnerability to climate change, and that a generalist diet does not ensure resilience to phenological mismatch.

DOI

10.18122/td/1724/boisestate

Available for download on Monday, August 01, 2022

Share

COinS