Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-1-2009

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220380802582346

Abstract

The third wave of democratization has been accompanied by the spread of new institutions that allow citizens to directly participate in shaping policy outcomes. Leading international organizations, such as the World Bank and UN Habitat, have disseminated “best practice” programs identified with “good government” policy reform efforts. One of the most well-known programs, Participatory Budgeting (PB), was first adopted by an entrepreneurial government in 1989 as a means to promote social justice, accountability, and transparency. Yet, when these programs are copied by policy advocates and pro forma adopters the political pay-offs for government officials are smaller, which leads them to provide weaker support for the adopted policy. This article demonstrates that policy entrepreneurs are more likely to provide greater resources and support to innovative policies than their policy advocates and pro forma adopter counterparts due to types of political payoffs available to them. The article concludes by considering when it might be most appropriate for international funding agencies and nongovernmental organizations to promote best practice policies.

Copyright Statement

This is an electronic version of an article published in Journal of Development Studies 45, no. 4: 572-592. Journal of Development Studies is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp. DOI: 10.1080/00220380802582346

Share

COinS